Which type of liability holds a person accountable for their actions regardless of care shown?

Strict liability is a legal doctrine that assigns responsibility for damages or injuries caused by a person or entity's actions, regardless of whether there was any intent to cause harm or any negligence involved. This means that even if the responsible party acted with the utmost care, they can still be held liable for the consequences of their actions under strict liability rules.

This concept is often applied in cases involving inherently dangerous activities, certain product liability cases, and other contexts where the law wants to ensure that those engaging in certain activities bear the risk of potential harm. For example, a manufacturer could be held strictly liable for injuries caused by a defective product, even if they followed all safety regulations and took care in the manufacturing process.

To clarify the context surrounding the other options: intentional liability involves actions taken with the intent to cause harm; negligence liability pertains to failure to exercise reasonable care, leading to harm; and general liability covers a broader category of risks and responsibilities but does not specifically denote liability without regard for care.